Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Chamorro Mera, Antonio | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Miranda González, Francisco Javier | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Pérez Mayo, Jesús | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Vega Gómez, Francisco I. | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-11T12:43:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-11T12:43:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-31 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191238 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The COVID-19 pandemic has forced some instructors to delve more deeply into the use of Web 2.0 based teaching tools and others to start using them for the first time. This article presents the results of a survey in which 1,344 Spanish university professors and 3,930 Italian professors participated, from all fields of knowledge. The objective is to assess whether university professors perceive that the use of web 2.0 tools will increase in the coming years and thus alter the way they teach after the face-to-face classroom teaching system has been restored. The results show that the perception of change is fairly high and this perception depends mainly on psychographic characteristics, such as attitude, perceived usefulness, social norms, and affective commitment to teaching. Similarities and differences between the two samples of university professors are discussed. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [ES] La pandemia por el virus COVID-19 ha obligado a muchos docentes universitarios a iniciarse en el uso de herramientas docentes basadas en la Web 2.0. A través de una encuesta, en la que han participado 1.344 profesores españoles y 3.930 profesores italianos de todos los campos de conocimiento, se ha evaluado si los docentes perciben que el uso de herramientas como las plataformas de videos, los blogs o las aplicaciones de trabajo colaborativo aumentará en los próximos años y modificará su forma de dar clases, aunque sea en un sistema de docencia presencial. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto que, en ambos países, la percepción del cambio es bastante alta y que esta percepción depende principalmente de características psicográficas del profesor, tales como la actitud, la utilidad percibida, la norma social y el compromiso afectivo con la docencia. Se comentan semejanzas y diferencias entre las dos muestras de profesores universitarios. | es_ES |
dc.language | Español | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Web 2.0 | es_ES |
dc.subject | Educational technology | es_ES |
dc.subject | Covid-19 | es_ES |
dc.subject | Teaching tools | es_ES |
dc.subject | Institutions of higher education | es_ES |
dc.subject | Tecnología de la educación | es_ES |
dc.subject | Herramientas docentes | es_ES |
dc.subject | Instituciones de enseñanza superior | es_ES |
dc.title | Las herramientas docentes web 2.0: el efecto Covid-19 entre el profesorado universitario de España e Italia | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | Web 2.0 teaching tools: the Covid-19 effect among university teachers in Spain and Italy | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/redu.2022.18663 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Chamorro Mera, A.; Miranda González, FJ.; Pérez Mayo, J.; Vega Gómez, FI. (2022). Las herramientas docentes web 2.0: el efecto Covid-19 entre el profesorado universitario de España e Italia. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 20(2):181-197. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2022.18663 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | OJS | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2022.18663 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 181 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 197 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 20 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 2 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1887-4592 | |
dc.relation.pasarela | OJS\18663 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Aslan, A., Zhu, C. (2016). Influencing factors and integration of ICT into teaching practices of pre-service and starting teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(2), 359-37. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.81048 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Batsila, M., Vavougios, D., Tsihouridis, C., Ioannidis, G.S. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of Web 2.0 tools in educational practice—A critical approach. In 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 464-472). Dubai. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2014.7017817 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bennett, L. (2014). Putting in more: emotional work in adopting online tools in teaching and learning practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 919-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.934343 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Buabeng-Andoh, C., Yaokumah, W., Tarhini, A. (2019). Investigating students’ intentions to use ICT: A comparison of theoretical models. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9796-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Butler, J.W. (2012). Grappling with change: Web 2.0 and teacher educators. In Developing technology-rich teacher education programs: Key issues (pp. 135-150). Hersey. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-0014-0.ch010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carril, P.C.M., Sanmamed, M.G., Abeledo, E.J.F. (2011). Competencias tecnológicas del profesorado universitario. Análisis de su formación en ofimática. Educación XX1, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.14.2.249 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Elkaseh, A.M., Wong, K.W., Fung, C.C. (2016). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of social media for e-learning in Libyan higher education: A structural equation modeling analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.683 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | González Robles, R., Polanco Bueno, R., Peñalosa Castro, E. (2021). Desarrollo de una escala de actitudes hacia el uso de las Tecnologías de la información y la Comunicación (TIC) en la actividad docente. Revista de la Educación Superior, 197, vol. 50, 97-116. https://doi.org/10.36857/resu.2021.197.1581 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Pratama, R., Harja, H. (2019). Predicting factors affecting intention to use web 2.0 in learning: evidence from science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.595 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huang, F., Teo, T., Zhou, M. (2020). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet-based technology for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kompen, R.T., Edirisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsina, M., Monguet, J.M. (2019). Personal learning Environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Martín, A.H., de Arriba, J.M. (2017). Concepciones de los docentes no universitarios sobre el aprendizaje colaborativo con TIC. Educación XX1, 20(1), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17508 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Muhaimin, H., Mukminin, A., Pratama, R., Asrial, H. (2019). Predicting Factors Affecting Intention to use Web 2.0 in Learning: Evidence from Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(4), 595. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.595 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nikou, S.A., Economides, A.A. (2019). Factors that influence behavioral intention to use mobile-based assessment: A STEM teachers’ perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12609 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Palmer, N., Schueths, A.M. (2013). Online teaching communities within sociology: A counter trend to the marketization of higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(7), 809-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.836097 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Prasojo, L., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Sofyan, S., Indrayana, B., Anwar, K. (2020). Factors Influencing Intention to Use Web 2.0 in Indonesian Vocational High Schools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(5), 100-118. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.10605 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rejón-Guardia, F., Polo-Peña, A.I., Maraver-Tarifa, G. (2019). The acceptance of a personal learning environment based on Google apps: the role of subjective norms and social image. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09206-1 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sadaf, A., Gezer, T. (2020). Exploring factors that influence teachers’ intentions to integrate digital literacy using the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 21532974.2020.1719244 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sadaf, A., Newby, T.J., Ertmer, P.A. (2012). Exploring pre-service teachers’ beliefs about using Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 classroom. Computers & Education, 59(3), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sadaf, A., Newby, T.J., Ertmer, P.A. (2016). An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 37-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9410-9 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sugar, W., Crawley, F., Fine, B. (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 201-213. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., Hoi, C.K.W. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: A Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Venkatesh, V., Rabah, J., Fusaro, M., Couture, A., Varela, W., Alexander, K. (2016). Factors impacting university instructors’ and students’ perceptions of course effectiveness and technology integration in the age of web 2.0. McGill Journal of Education/Revue Des Sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 51(1), 533–561. https://doi.org/10.7202/1037358ar | es_ES |