- -

Quality assessment program of the teaching activity of the higher education faculty staff. A case study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Quality assessment program of the teaching activity of the higher education faculty staff. A case study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Llopis-AlbertRubioZeng ...
Tamaño: 1.169Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Llopis-Albert, Carlos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rubio, Francisco es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zeng, Shouzhen es_ES
dc.contributor.author Devece Carañana, Carlos Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Torner Feltrer, María Eugenia Milagro es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-04-25T10:59:27Z
dc.date.available 2023-04-25T10:59:27Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04-04
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/192932
dc.description.abstract [EN] The European Higher Education area has as one of its axes of development the promotion of quality in universities. Within this framework, the assessment of the quality of the teaching staff is highly recommended. With this aim the Teaching Evaluation Support Programme (DOCENTIA) promoted by Spanish National Agency for Quality Assessment and Accreditation (ANECA) is designed to satisfy the needs of the higher education system for a model and procedures to guarantee the quality of the teaching activity while fostering its development and recognition. Currently, more than 90% of the Spanish universities participate in this program, throughout its different phases. This paper presents this program, explains how it is being implemented at the Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV, Spain), and provides the proposed amendments by the evaluation commission during the follow-up verification phase that must be justified and solved during the monitoring phase, which is currently in progress, to obtain the certification. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) es_ES
dc.subject Teaching Evaluation Support Programme es_ES
dc.subject Quality Assessment and Accreditation es_ES
dc.subject Certification es_ES
dc.subject DOCENTIA es_ES
dc.subject Evidence es_ES
dc.title Quality assessment program of the teaching activity of the higher education faculty staff. A case study es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/muse.2023.19338
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y de Materiales - Departament d'Enginyeria Mecànica i de Materials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería del Diseño - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria del Disseny es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Mecánica de los Medios Continuos y Teoría de Estructuras - Departament de Mecànica dels Medis Continus i Teoria d'Estructures es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Llopis-Albert, C.; Rubio, F.; Zeng, S.; Devece Carañana, CA.; Torner Feltrer, MEM. (2023). Quality assessment program of the teaching activity of the higher education faculty staff. A case study. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences. 10(1):94-113. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2023.19338 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2023.19338 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 94 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 113 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 10 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2341-2593
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\19338 es_ES
dc.description.references ANECA (2021). Support programme for teaching activity assessment. Evaluation model. Agencia Nacional de Evaluación de la Calidad y Acreditación, Spain (ANECA). es_ES
dc.description.references Baldridge, J. V. (1968). Power and conflict in the university: theory and research in the sociology of complex organizations. Yale University. es_ES
dc.description.references Ďurišová, M., Kucharčíková, A. Tokarčíková, E. (2015). Assessment of higher education teaching outcomes (Quality of Higher Education). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2497-2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.922 es_ES
dc.description.references Enders, J., Westerheijden, D.F. (2014). Quality Assurance in the European Policy Arena. Policy and Society, 33(3), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references ENQA (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education). (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. Brussels: ENQA. Accessed 24 April, 2018. http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Fajčíková A., Fejfarová M. (2019). Evaluation of the quality of teaching from the perspective of university students. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 12(2), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2019.120201 es_ES
dc.description.references Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993). Defining Quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102 es_ES
dc.description.references Hoy, W.K. and Miskel, C.G. (1996). Educational Administration. Theory, research and practice. New York: McGraw-Hill. es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, Y., Zeng, S., Llopis-Albert, C., Ullah, K., Yang, Y. (2021). Social Network Group Decision-Making Method Based on Q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Set and Its Application in the Evaluation of Online Teaching Quality. Axioms, 10(3), 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10030168 es_ES
dc.description.references Ley Orgánica 1/2004, de 28 de diciembre, de Medidas de Protección Integral contra la Violencia de Género. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2004-21760#a4 es_ES
dc.description.references Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F. (2021). Methodology to evaluate transversal competences in the master's degree in industrial engineering based on a system of rubrics and indicators. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences 8(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2021.15244 es_ES
dc.description.references Llopis-Albert, C., Rubio, F., Zeng, S., Grima-Olmedo, J., Grima-Olmedo, C. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) applied to Mechanical Engineering. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences 9(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2022.17269 es_ES
dc.description.references Lucas, L. (2014). Academic Resistance to Quality Assurance Processes in Higher Education in the UK. Policy and Society 33(3), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.09.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Mas de les Valls, E. et al. (2019). Perspectiva de género en docencia STEM. VI Xornada Universitaria Galega en Xénero. Reconstruindo o coñecemento. Edición a cargo de Ana Jesús López Díaz, Eva Aguayo Lorenzo e Águeda Gómez Suárez. Universidade da Coruña, 2019. ISBN: 978-84-9749-758-9. https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497497589 es_ES
dc.description.references Olaskoaga-Larrauri, J.; González-Laskibar, X. and Barrenetxea-Ayesta, M. (2015). Political nature and socio-professional determinants of the concept of quality, Higher Education, 69(4), 673-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9796-z es_ES
dc.description.references Owlia, M., Aspinwall, E. (1996). A Framework for the Dimensions of Quality in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education 4(2), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889610116012 es_ES
dc.description.references Paradeise, C., Thoenig, J.C. (2013). Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards. Organization Studies 34 (2): 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612473550 es_ES
dc.description.references Reeves, C., Bednar, D. (1994). Defining Quality: Alternatives and Implications. Academy of Management Review 19(3), 419-445. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9412271805 es_ES
dc.description.references Rubio, F., Llopis-Albert, C., Zeng, S. (2022). Best practices and syllabus design and course planning applied tomechanical engineering subjects. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 9(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2022.18230 es_ES
dc.description.references Shevlin, M. Banyard, P., Davies, M., Griffiths, M. (2000). The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, Love my Lectures? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(4), 397-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611436 es_ES
dc.description.references Seyfried, M., Pohlenz, P. (2018). Assessing quality assurance in higher education: quality managers' perceptions of effectiveness. European Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474777 es_ES
dc.description.references UPV. (2020). Proyecto institucional competencias transversales. Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV). Valencia. Spain. https://www.upv.es/entidades/ICE/info/Proyecto_Institucional_CT.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references UPV. (2014). Manual de evaluación de la actividad docente del profesorado de la Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV). Report, 58 pages. http://www.upv.es/entidades/VOAP/info/IADmanual.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references UPV. (2023). Procedimiento de evaluación de la Calidad de la Actividad Docente del profesorado de la Universitat Politècnica de València. Modelo DOCENTIA UPV. es_ES
dc.description.references Xarxa Vives. (2019). Guides for university teaching with a gender perspective. Xarxa Vives d'Universitats. Available at: https://www.vives.org/coleccio/guies-per-a-una-docencia-universitaria-amb-perspectiva-de-genere/ es_ES
dc.description.references Zeng, S., Zhang, Na, Zhang, C., Su, W., Llopis-Albert, C. (2022). Social network multiple-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating unmanned ground delivery vehicles under the Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121414 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem