- -

Sustainability in CALL Learning Environments: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Sustainability in CALL Learning Environments: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 3631-11405-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 630.9Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author McDonald, Peter es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-25T12:39:49Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-25T12:39:49Z
dc.date.issued 2014-09-25
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/81770
dc.description.abstract [EN] This research aims to define a sustainable resource in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). In order for a CALL resource to be sustainable it must work within existing educational curricula. This feature is a necessary prerequisite of sustainability because, despite the potential for educational change that digitalization has offered since the nineteen nineties, curricula in traditional educational institutions have not fundamentally changed, even as we move from a pre-digital society towards a digital society. Curricula have failed to incorporate CALL resources because no agreed-upon pedagogical language enables teachers to discuss CALL classroom practices. Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG) can help to provide this language and bridge the gap between the needs of the curriculum and the potentiality of CALL-based resources. This paper will outline how SFG principles can be used to create a pedagogical language for CALL and it will give practical examples of how this language can be used to create sustainable resources in classroom contexts. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof The EuroCALL Review
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject CALL es_ES
dc.subject Multimodality es_ES
dc.subject Systemic Functional Grammar es_ES
dc.subject Sustainability es_ES
dc.subject Curriculum innovation es_ES
dc.title Sustainability in CALL Learning Environments: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2017-05-25T10:54:59Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/eurocall.2014.3631
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Mcdonald, P. (2014). Sustainability in CALL Learning Environments: A Systemic Functional Grammar Approach. The EuroCALL Review. 22(2):3-18. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2014.3631 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2014.3631 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 3 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 18 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 22
dc.description.issue 2
dc.identifier.eissn 1695-2618
dc.description.references Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. Columbia: Teachers College. es_ES
dc.description.references Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references DeVoss, D.N., Eidman-Aadahl, E., & Hicks, T. (2010). Because Digital Writing Matters. CA: John Wiley & Sons. es_ES
dc.description.references Fries, P.H. (1994). On Theme Rheme and Discourse Goals. In M. Coulthard (ed.). Advances in Written Text Analysis. (pp. 229- 249). New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Gee, Paul, (2011). Reflections On Empirical Evidence On Games and Learning. In T.Sigmund & J.D. Flechter (Eds.), Computer Games and Instruction. (pp. 223-232). Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing es_ES
dc.description.references Hagood, M. (2008). Intersections of Popular Culture, Identities, and New Literacies. In J. Coiro et al (eds). Handbook of Research into New Literacies. (pp. 377-407). New York: Erlbaum. es_ES
dc.description.references Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder and Arnold. es_ES
dc.description.references Hoey, M. (2001). Textual Interaction. Oxon: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Kennedy, C. (2013). Models Of Change and Innovation. In K. Hyland & C. Wong (Eds.), Innovation and Change In English Language Education. (pp. 13-27). Oxen:Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Kress, G. (2003). LITERACY IN THE NEW MEDIA AGE. doi:10.4324/9780203164754 es_ES
dc.description.references Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images. London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, J. (2004). Effects of Comic Strips on L2 Learners’ Reading Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 225. doi:10.2307/3588379 es_ES
dc.description.references Luke, C. (2001). Connectivity, Multimodality and Interdisciplinarity. In Reading Research Quarterly, Vol.38, No.3, 397-403. es_ES
dc.description.references Tim Marchand. (2013). Speech in written form? A corpus analysis of computer-mediated communication. Linguistic Research, 30(2), 217-242. doi:10.17250/khisli.30.2.201308.004 es_ES
dc.description.references McCloud. S. (1994). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Collins. es_ES
dc.description.references Mc Donald, J. Haward, J. Dobbin, N. Erskine, G. (2008). Macbeth: The Graphic Novel. Bristol: Classical Comics Ltd. es_ES
dc.description.references Miller, C.H. (2004). Digital Storytelling. Oxford: Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Unsworth, L. (2008). Multiliteracies and Metalanguage: Describing Image Text Relations as a Resource for Negotiating Multimodal Texts. In J. Coiro et al. (eds). Handbook of Research into New Literacies. (pp. 377-407). New York: Erlbaum. es_ES
dc.description.references Royce, T. (2002). Multimodality in the TESOL Classroom: Exploring Visual-Verbal Synergy. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 191. doi:10.2307/3588330 es_ES
dc.description.references Rutherford, W. E. (1987). Second Language Grammar and Teaching. New York: Pearson Education. es_ES
dc.description.references Stempleski, S. (2013). World Link: Developing English Fluency. Singapore: Cengage es_ES
dc.description.references Stenglin, M. and Iedema, R. (2001). How to Analyse Visual Images: A Guide for TESOL Teachers. In A. Burns. & C. Coffin. Analyzing English in a Global Context. (pp.194-208) London: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Selfe, C.L. (2007). Multi-Modal Composition. NJ: Hampton Press. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem